Trusted Tester ACT Implementation

This page is under development and has not been approved by the working group.

Number of Rules Implemented
	Consistent	Partially consistent
WCAG 2 rules	0	0
Proposed rules	2	5

Implemented Rules

Rule Name	Type	Consistency
Text content that changes automatically can be paused, stopped or hidden	Proposed Rule	Consistent
Focusable element has no keyboard trap	Proposed Rule	Partial
Focusable element has no keyboard trap via non-standard navigation	Proposed Rule	Partial
Focusable element has no keyboard trap via standard navigation	Proposed Rule	Partial
Heading is descriptive	Proposed Rule	Partial
HTML graphics contain no text	Proposed Rule	Consistent
Video element auditory content has captions	Proposed Rule	Partial

About Trusted Tester Results

Results in this page are taken from a public test report published by US federal government. Data is published using the EARL+JSON-LD data format.

Implementation Details

Text content that changes automatically can be paused, stopped or hidden

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.2.2-auto-updating procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Text content that changes automatically can be paused, stopped or hidden proposed rule. It covers all 11 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide	2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide

Test Results
	2.2.2-auto-updating
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 5	inapplicable

Focusable element has no keyboard trap

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the Focusable element has no keyboard trap proposed rule. It covers 9 of the 16 examples. For 6 examples no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the test results. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap	2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Test Results
	2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	untested
Passed Example 5	untested
Passed Example 6	untested
Failed Example 1	passed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	untested
Failed Example 5	untested
Failed Example 6	untested
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable

Focusable element has no keyboard trap via non-standard navigation

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the Focusable element has no keyboard trap via non-standard navigation proposed rule. It covers all 7 examples. The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
None	2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Test Results
	2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	passed

Focusable element has no keyboard trap via standard navigation

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the Focusable element has no keyboard trap via standard navigation proposed rule. It covers all 10 examples. The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
None	2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Test Results
	2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	inapplicable
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable

Heading is descriptive

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.4.6-heading-purpose procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the Heading is descriptive proposed rule. It covers 14 of the 17 examples. For 3 examples no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the test results. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.4.6 Headings and Labels	2.4.6 Headings and Labels

Test Results
	2.4.6-heading-purpose
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	untested
Passed Example 5	passed
Passed Example 6	untested
Passed Example 7	passed
Passed Example 8	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	untested
Failed Example 4	failed
Failed Example 5	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable

HTML graphics contain no text

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 1.4.5-image-of-text procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the HTML graphics contain no text proposed rule. It covers all 14 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
1.4.5 Images of Text 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception)	1.4.5 Images of Text 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception)

Test Results
	1.4.5-image-of-text
Passed Example 1	inapplicable
Passed Example 2	inapplicable
Passed Example 3	inapplicable
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Passed Example 6	inapplicable
Passed Example 7	passed
Passed Example 8	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable

Video element auditory content has captions

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the Video element auditory content has captions proposed rule. It covers all 8 examples. The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
None	2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Test Results
	2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable